Film | The VidZone Network Blog - Part 2

May 1, 2009

Carl’s Movie Mini-Review: X-Men Origins: Wolverine

X-Men Origins: Wolverine

The movie is melodramatic. Though there’s only a few “slow” emotional scenes in the parade of action set-pieces, everything that happens is “super serious and very important, just look at the scowl on my face.” And I mean a parade of set-pieces. Even if several of them are incidental and small setups for later plot points, the production always makes sure there’s some eye candy, be it aggressive cinematography and/or something ‘sploding.

I jokingly call the movie Wolverine & His Excessive Co-stars, and I still think there are far more characters than necessary. However, their relational network is kept small, so it didn’t wind up feeling like Mortal Kombat Annihilation where there are characters just for the sake of ticking up some arbitrary cameo counter.

I’ve got two major complaints for an event pic like this. 1.) After all these years and advancements in technology and techniques, why does some of the wire-work still look laughable? 2.) You know what else is laughable?  There is no excuse for the CG claws to stand out and look so obviously bad and fake.

And speaking of fakes, there are actually two post-credits bonus scenes. Don’t leave after the I’m-not-sure-why-that-was-made-a-big-deal Stryker scene.

Not as good as the X-flicks, but worth it for the grand fight scenes.  I suppose it’s fair about how they’re different.  X-Men is a parable about society, and Wolverine is just about the visceral rush.

Carl @ 1:38 am
Filed under: Film,Reviews — Tags: , , , , ,

April 9, 2009

Yes, I still adore Disney animation…

…but to be fair, Robin Hood was notorious for being a reheated mess and that ’80s period was a low point in general.

Watch Disney Templates on CollegeHumor
Carl @ 2:47 am
Filed under: Film,Techniques — Tags: , , ,

April 7, 2009

Carl’s Movie Mini-Review: Fast & Furious

Fast & Furious

First, a little background.  With the notable exception of Tokyo Drift, I’d never seen any of the previous movie in whole.  I caught bits and pieces of them on TV or on flights, but I never got pulled in.  This past weekend, in anticipation of catching director Justin Lin’s second go at the franchise and the original’s direct sequel, I watched my DVD of the first movie.  I bought the DVD long ago as part of a promotional two-pack of the first two movies that also included a preview DVD and ticket for Tokyo Drift.  The “acting” of the first movie was painful, the production value and lighting awful, and plot plodding.

The article-free sequel is a noticable improvement on all fronts.  Everything and everyone is much prettier, the line delivery adequate, and pacing brisk.  Tons of exciting car (and foot) chases, fights, and explosions.  It does, however, assume previous knowledge of the procedings of the first movie (and does have a tie to Tokyo Drift) and squandered some perfect opportunities to slip in a non-hokey introduction dialogue to explain certain initially vague and confusing pre-existing character relationships (that does get cleared up for any confused viewers in the second act).

There isn’t really more to say other than it delivers the fun.  Hey, it even has the “rambo lambo,” the Lamborghini LM002.  Also, if you actually watch the end titles, you’ll see it’s actually a continuation of the final scene and not just random computer effects.

Carl @ 2:11 am
Filed under: Film,Reviews — Tags: , , , ,

March 7, 2009

Pocketbook giving up the ghost

I’m not so hot on the old Pac-Man/Ms. Pac-Man video game.  BUT.  Pac-Man Championship Edition is one of my favorite Xbox Live Arcade games, and I totally dug the Pac-Man 2 point ‘n slingshot game on 16-bit.  He’s such a cultural icon that I’ve developed a sort of mini-collection of Pac-Man t-shirts within my wardrobe.  Unfortunately, being in the economic bind I’m in, I should cut back on buying any more frivolous graphic tees.  It’s a shame, though.  Just look at these cool Ghostbusters crossover designs! (Click images to go to their sites.)

Busted @ SplitReason.com
Busted design @ © SplitReason.com

Carl @ 2:15 pm
Filed under: Film,Games,Personal — Tags: , , , ,

March 6, 2009

Carl’s Movie Mini-Review: Watchmen

Watchmen

(Note: I’ve never read the original graphic novel, so I can only judge the film on its own merits.)

First, a tangent: Chuck and I randomly decided to catch the midnight showing of Watchmen rather than simply purchase tickets for Friday.  Being that we’re pretty far from the college, it turns out that they hadn’t sold out of tickets.  In fact, when we returned to the theater after wasting a few hours in wait, there were still people buying tickets.  We finally let out right at 3am.  I don’t know whose crazy business decision it was to stay open and keep staff until past 3am for a single screen.  I mean, unless it’s a Friday or Saturday night, final showings are usually around 10:40pm, letting out around 1-ish.  That’s an extra 2 hours they had to pay staff!

It’s no secret that I’m no fan of director Zack Snyder’s previous work 300.  It was just a bunch of naked dudes screaming and yelling.  With no background on Watchmen, my only expectation/hope coming in was that it would be better than 300.

Watchmen was a stellar and tight effort.  There’s a small core cast, and there’s enough time spent on them individually and in pairs that you get a feel for the character and their chemistry amongst each other.  There are several extended vignettes for a handful of the characters that further delve into their backgrounds, but not all of the represented characters are given that same treatment.

Those who come looking for a wham-bam action flick will be disappointed…to a certain degree.  The story unfolds slowly and meticulously.  The plot itself is more akin to a mystery, but the significant focus is on exploring the characters.  How do certain people react to bad situations?  To distant partners, to break-ups?  To professional obligations?  To being “fresh meat” in a prison?  To the generational misunderstandings between parent and child?  To convincing people that contributing to the greater good means “cracking a few eggs to make an omelette?”  To impending global thermonuclear warfare?  That said, the action presented is intensely brutal with just the right amount of editing.  Cuts are made to make sure the composition remains dramatic, but the camera can, at times, be unflinching in presenting grotesque scenes.

I have a few technical issues with some of the effects work, notably the obvious wire-work assisting Rorschach’s prowling and the odd lack of shadow when compositing CG characters.

There is a tremendous focus on using 1970′s/1980′s media to date the setting.  There is plenty of TV-watching and perhaps overly prominent use of licensed songs.

Those looking for another dose of superhero action will be sorely disappointed; this film’s strongly in the drama category.  It’s a cerebral, meta take on masked crusaders as real people and something I will highly recommend.

After the movie Chuck told me about how things played out in the original book.  It seems to me it was a very wise decision to adjust the focus, trim down the cast, and avoid a likely awkward deus ex machina plot device that would make an already long movie quite clumsy.  I just ordered the book off of Amazon (on sale for $10.99!), so maybe I’ll have a different take on it after I’ve read the source material.  Chuck said that though he prefers the way things are handled in the book, as a stand-alone work, the film was great.

Carl @ 4:36 am
Filed under: Film,Reviews — Tags: , , , , ,

February 20, 2009

Carl’s Movie Mini-Review: Coraline (3D)

This was an unfortunately uneven, rough film.

Firstly, the 3D is fantastic. Though there are some instances of cheap “shove-it-in-your-face” moments, the majority of it really expands the depth of the canvas, showcasing many wide open vistas or enormous rooms. The whole visual design is stunning and camera angles incredibly dynamic. It’s not as if it were a stage production with only a rear wall or perhaps two other flanking walls. You are given a full 360-degree view as Coraline explores.

Story was a oddly paced. The first 2/3 of the film consist of a series of character vignettes, exploring Coraline’s apartment and neighbors, contrasting between the normal and “other” world. Then at the end, it randomly turns into a The Legend of Zelda. Seriously, it’s like a video game, where she goes into various uniquely-themed “dungeons” figures out an environmental puzzle with the help of a newly acquired piece of equipment, defeats the boss, and then she earns one of three magical baubles that allows her to challenge the final villain…who is a multi-form boss, so the fight’s not quite over just when you think it is. Seriously.

No, Seriously.

Tone is creepy throughout. Everything feels “just-not-right.” I certainly feel it would be unsettling for younger tykes. I remember being so creeped out at Never-ending Story II as a kid that I spent quite a long portion of the movie hiding under the seat. Something I think parents would object to is the overt sexuality flaunted by the two actresses who live in the apartment downstairs. Littering the walls of their home are old posters for what seem to be punnily named burlesque shows. One of them has enormous breasts that fill the screen, and I think there was an old-lady puppet nipple poking through a sweater on the other. In a scene later when they put on a production, one plays a mermaid, and the big-bossomed one the Venus on the Half Shell, wearing less than a scantily clad woman on a beach. The background art also has your usual classical naked woman paintings, completely with exposed nipples. Sure, the movie is rated PG, but I wouldn’t rate this movie as a “mature story.” It still feels like it was aiming right children, and there didn’t seem to be much played to older minds.

Uh, Coraline is an annoying brat. I’m sure that’s an accurate portrayal of a young girl, but it does no favors in helping the audience like the heroine.  However, the “what I care about right now is the most important thing in the world, ever” mentality of children is respectably represented.

Characters over- and broadly emote. And they narrate. Not only is the “show, don’t tell” rule broken, they over-do it.

The voice acting was passable, but I didn’t get lost in it. Best overall and likable character was the father, in both forms.

The dancing mice section was adorable.

Recommendation? If you can still catch it in 3D, do so. If not, I’d say wait for video.

Carl @ 5:34 pm
Filed under: Film,Reviews — Tags: ,

December 5, 2008

Carl’s Movie Mini-Review: Hancock

When I saw the number of production logos leading into the movie, I had a bad feeling. All the reviews say it’s like two different movies duct taped together. To me, it felt like three (though the middle one was only about 15 minutes). The tone of the movie shifted so many times. I almost had the sense it was one of those vignette anthologies that allow different artists/filmmakers/etc. to explore their own unique takes on a character, ala Animatrix/Gotham Knight or different story archs with comic book characters. I don’t think the number of writers and producers listed could be accurate. It felt like there was a lack of consistent direction.

Now, it’s not a total mess, but it has too many unfortunate where’d-that-come-from? moments.

Dear Sony. Why do your big summer blockbusters have horrible special effects? Spider-man, even if crowds got tired after a couple sequels, would still pull in the big bucks. With Hancock, Will Smith is Mr. 4th of July. You’re guaranteed to make the money back; please invest more money in the effects budget so my eyes don’t bleed!

While I’m not going to tell you to avoid the movie, neither will I tell you it’s something worth seeing. It’s awkward, but it’s a fair way to spend an hour and a half.

Carl @ 10:10 pm
Filed under: Film,Reviews — Tags: , ,

October 25, 2008

Carl’s Movie Mini-Review: Max Payne

So. There was a series of events. That were, for the great majority, expedient in arriving at their intended goal. No time for any distractions, we’re here for business. In and out!

Also. There were many things you expect to be said in one of these cop dramas. Since you’ve heard it all already, they didn’t need to deliver it well; it’s ground you’re already familiar with.

Fortunately things got a little more exciting once Max started tripping out on drugs. I was very worried that there wouldn’t be Paynekiller-popping.

So here’s the moral of the story: Sure, everyone else goes through horrible shit when on drugs; life’s a living hell. But if you’re totally emo, taking some drugs can make you an unstoppable super hero! Regular people and happy druggies die from just one bullet, but your pharmaceutically-enhanced emo veil of darkness protects you from all kinds of harm, no sweat!

Be sure to stay for the scene at the end where Tony Stark walks into a moody bar to propose a partnership.

Carl @ 10:09 pm
Filed under: Film,Reviews — Tags:


« Newer Posts