Adaptation | The VidZone Network Blog

March 7, 2010

Carl’s Movie Mini-Review: Alice in Wonderland

Tim Burton’s take on the Alice story seems to have all the right parts: A vibrant, committed, perfect-fit cast, spectacular costuming, and a focused end-point from the get-go. But somehow all these parts didn’t seem well-edited together. Taken individually, the scenes are fine, but I often found myself asking “is this what I’m really concerned with right now?”

In that vein, let me continue this post with a disjointed series of random thoughts:

1. Just how much incomprehensible, demented madness can you tolerate? This movie embodies weirdness, and an example of such is that much of what the Mad Hatter says is like a completely foreign language (though that’s not exclusive to him).

2. As I said before, the costuming is amazing. Alice goes through numerous costume changes as she grows/shrinks and changes company, and even some of the minor characters don’t adhere to the cartoon-character same-clothes-every-day standard.

3. I get Johnny Depp is a bankable name, but I think it’s completely strange that this is being sold as his movie. Which is not to say he doesn’t play a prominent role in it–which he does. I never read the original stories and it’s been a decade or two since I last saw the original Disney cartoon adaptation, but I don’t recall the Mad Hatter being such a central character. Still, in this politically-charged story, his role as a leader in the “tea party” revolution makes sense. Make no mistake, though, this is still Alice’s show all the way through.

4. I think all this movie needed was some cool-down time. Everyone was always rushing around, determined, almost every scene a little too urgent. Can we have a little time to simmer and reflect over what’s going on before throwing the next beat at us?

5. Avril Lavigne. I’ve been wondering what you’ve been up to. Did they not invite you to perform at the Olympics? (If they did, I didn’t follow the games, so I plead ignorance.)

6. Crispin Glover seems as tall & lanky as ever. But then again, almost everyone is caricaturized by CG augmentation. I think I only saw three untouched humans in Wonderland. It works, though.

7. I loved all the side/minor characters except the Mad Hatter. That dude’s just disturbed/disturbing.

It’s not the most easily digestible movie, but I think this is one of those times where the effort is worth appreciating.

Carl @ 1:27 am
Filed under: Film,Reviews — Tags: , , ,

March 6, 2009

Carl’s Movie Mini-Review: Watchmen

Watchmen

(Note: I’ve never read the original graphic novel, so I can only judge the film on its own merits.)

First, a tangent: Chuck and I randomly decided to catch the midnight showing of Watchmen rather than simply purchase tickets for Friday.  Being that we’re pretty far from the college, it turns out that they hadn’t sold out of tickets.  In fact, when we returned to the theater after wasting a few hours in wait, there were still people buying tickets.  We finally let out right at 3am.  I don’t know whose crazy business decision it was to stay open and keep staff until past 3am for a single screen.  I mean, unless it’s a Friday or Saturday night, final showings are usually around 10:40pm, letting out around 1-ish.  That’s an extra 2 hours they had to pay staff!

It’s no secret that I’m no fan of director Zack Snyder’s previous work 300.  It was just a bunch of naked dudes screaming and yelling.  With no background on Watchmen, my only expectation/hope coming in was that it would be better than 300.

Watchmen was a stellar and tight effort.  There’s a small core cast, and there’s enough time spent on them individually and in pairs that you get a feel for the character and their chemistry amongst each other.  There are several extended vignettes for a handful of the characters that further delve into their backgrounds, but not all of the represented characters are given that same treatment.

Those who come looking for a wham-bam action flick will be disappointed…to a certain degree.  The story unfolds slowly and meticulously.  The plot itself is more akin to a mystery, but the significant focus is on exploring the characters.  How do certain people react to bad situations?  To distant partners, to break-ups?  To professional obligations?  To being “fresh meat” in a prison?  To the generational misunderstandings between parent and child?  To convincing people that contributing to the greater good means “cracking a few eggs to make an omelette?”  To impending global thermonuclear warfare?  That said, the action presented is intensely brutal with just the right amount of editing.  Cuts are made to make sure the composition remains dramatic, but the camera can, at times, be unflinching in presenting grotesque scenes.

I have a few technical issues with some of the effects work, notably the obvious wire-work assisting Rorschach’s prowling and the odd lack of shadow when compositing CG characters.

There is a tremendous focus on using 1970′s/1980′s media to date the setting.  There is plenty of TV-watching and perhaps overly prominent use of licensed songs.

Those looking for another dose of superhero action will be sorely disappointed; this film’s strongly in the drama category.  It’s a cerebral, meta take on masked crusaders as real people and something I will highly recommend.

After the movie Chuck told me about how things played out in the original book.  It seems to me it was a very wise decision to adjust the focus, trim down the cast, and avoid a likely awkward deus ex machina plot device that would make an already long movie quite clumsy.  I just ordered the book off of Amazon (on sale for $10.99!), so maybe I’ll have a different take on it after I’ve read the source material.  Chuck said that though he prefers the way things are handled in the book, as a stand-alone work, the film was great.

Carl @ 4:36 am
Filed under: Film,Reviews — Tags: , , , , ,

October 25, 2008

Carl’s Movie Mini-Review: Max Payne

So. There was a series of events. That were, for the great majority, expedient in arriving at their intended goal. No time for any distractions, we’re here for business. In and out!

Also. There were many things you expect to be said in one of these cop dramas. Since you’ve heard it all already, they didn’t need to deliver it well; it’s ground you’re already familiar with.

Fortunately things got a little more exciting once Max started tripping out on drugs. I was very worried that there wouldn’t be Paynekiller-popping.

So here’s the moral of the story: Sure, everyone else goes through horrible shit when on drugs; life’s a living hell. But if you’re totally emo, taking some drugs can make you an unstoppable super hero! Regular people and happy druggies die from just one bullet, but your pharmaceutically-enhanced emo veil of darkness protects you from all kinds of harm, no sweat!

Be sure to stay for the scene at the end where Tony Stark walks into a moody bar to propose a partnership.

Carl @ 10:09 pm
Filed under: Film,Reviews — Tags: