Superheroes | The VidZone Network Blog

May 6, 2011

Carl’s Movie Mini-Review: Thoughts on Thor

Rainbow Road

Ultimately, it turns out Thor is a movie about love (not strictly romance) and respect. With a throne at stake, sibling rivalry, and corruption within the kingdom, perhaps Kenneth Branagh–better know for his Shakespearean work–is the appropriate director for this particular “summer blockbuster.”

That said, this is a more introspective superhero movie, reminding us that sometimes comic book stories have more to tell than simply who’s next in line for an ass-beating. I would say Thor is more similar in tone to Ang Lee’s Hulk than it is with pretty much any other more action-oriented superhero movie. (more…)

March 6, 2009

Carl’s Movie Mini-Review: Watchmen

Watchmen

(Note: I’ve never read the original graphic novel, so I can only judge the film on its own merits.)

First, a tangent: Chuck and I randomly decided to catch the midnight showing of Watchmen rather than simply purchase tickets for Friday.  Being that we’re pretty far from the college, it turns out that they hadn’t sold out of tickets.  In fact, when we returned to the theater after wasting a few hours in wait, there were still people buying tickets.  We finally let out right at 3am.  I don’t know whose crazy business decision it was to stay open and keep staff until past 3am for a single screen.  I mean, unless it’s a Friday or Saturday night, final showings are usually around 10:40pm, letting out around 1-ish.  That’s an extra 2 hours they had to pay staff!

It’s no secret that I’m no fan of director Zack Snyder’s previous work 300.  It was just a bunch of naked dudes screaming and yelling.  With no background on Watchmen, my only expectation/hope coming in was that it would be better than 300.

Watchmen was a stellar and tight effort.  There’s a small core cast, and there’s enough time spent on them individually and in pairs that you get a feel for the character and their chemistry amongst each other.  There are several extended vignettes for a handful of the characters that further delve into their backgrounds, but not all of the represented characters are given that same treatment.

Those who come looking for a wham-bam action flick will be disappointed…to a certain degree.  The story unfolds slowly and meticulously.  The plot itself is more akin to a mystery, but the significant focus is on exploring the characters.  How do certain people react to bad situations?  To distant partners, to break-ups?  To professional obligations?  To being “fresh meat” in a prison?  To the generational misunderstandings between parent and child?  To convincing people that contributing to the greater good means “cracking a few eggs to make an omelette?”  To impending global thermonuclear warfare?  That said, the action presented is intensely brutal with just the right amount of editing.  Cuts are made to make sure the composition remains dramatic, but the camera can, at times, be unflinching in presenting grotesque scenes.

I have a few technical issues with some of the effects work, notably the obvious wire-work assisting Rorschach’s prowling and the odd lack of shadow when compositing CG characters.

There is a tremendous focus on using 1970′s/1980′s media to date the setting.  There is plenty of TV-watching and perhaps overly prominent use of licensed songs.

Those looking for another dose of superhero action will be sorely disappointed; this film’s strongly in the drama category.  It’s a cerebral, meta take on masked crusaders as real people and something I will highly recommend.

After the movie Chuck told me about how things played out in the original book.  It seems to me it was a very wise decision to adjust the focus, trim down the cast, and avoid a likely awkward deus ex machina plot device that would make an already long movie quite clumsy.  I just ordered the book off of Amazon (on sale for $10.99!), so maybe I’ll have a different take on it after I’ve read the source material.  Chuck said that though he prefers the way things are handled in the book, as a stand-alone work, the film was great.

Carl @ 4:36 am
Filed under: Film,Reviews — Tags: , , , , ,

December 5, 2008

Carl’s Movie Mini-Review: Hancock

When I saw the number of production logos leading into the movie, I had a bad feeling. All the reviews say it’s like two different movies duct taped together. To me, it felt like three (though the middle one was only about 15 minutes). The tone of the movie shifted so many times. I almost had the sense it was one of those vignette anthologies that allow different artists/filmmakers/etc. to explore their own unique takes on a character, ala Animatrix/Gotham Knight or different story archs with comic book characters. I don’t think the number of writers and producers listed could be accurate. It felt like there was a lack of consistent direction.

Now, it’s not a total mess, but it has too many unfortunate where’d-that-come-from? moments.

Dear Sony. Why do your big summer blockbusters have horrible special effects? Spider-man, even if crowds got tired after a couple sequels, would still pull in the big bucks. With Hancock, Will Smith is Mr. 4th of July. You’re guaranteed to make the money back; please invest more money in the effects budget so my eyes don’t bleed!

While I’m not going to tell you to avoid the movie, neither will I tell you it’s something worth seeing. It’s awkward, but it’s a fair way to spend an hour and a half.

Carl @ 10:10 pm
Filed under: Film,Reviews — Tags: , ,